Especially me, psychology is now in July in the fingers and there it goes according to title page, including the topic of 'Education': "The five competencies for the future." Then I open the page and I laughed the title "Knowledge Quintet: Five Intelligences for the 21st Century" against. The teaser is then: "The intelligence researcher Howard Gardner calls for five key competencies." Yeah and the little book by Gardner to the then relates the article is, consequently, "Five Minds for the Future." If I (cherish now without deeper ulterior motives) to just google, then I come easily to the Wikipedia entry " Theory of Mind " and there is then:
The term Theory of Mind (ToM) refers to make psychology and other cognitive sciences, the ability to adoption of conscious processes in other people to think so in others feelings, needs, intentions, expectations and opinions.
Other names: naive theory or mentalization.
Peter Fonagy, a psychoanalytic researchers defined the concept of mentalization as follows: Mentalization is the "ability to own behavior or the behavior of other people to interpret through attribution of mental states." For the term, there are no uniform German equivalent.
AM Leslie sees the theory of mind as a mechanism of selective attention. If the presence of mental concepts that basis, the attention to the mental states of actors should be paid. Thus, these properties can be developed.
...
basis of the development of a theory of mind ability to distinguish between animate and inanimate is able to animate because only internal states are ascribed. Add to that the ability differentiate between mental and physical worlds. ... Another step for the development of a ToM is the recognition that actions can be directed others not only by their desires and intentions, but also on their beliefs. This distinction is relevant when someone else has an incorrect understanding of a situation. As long as a person has a "true" belief, there is no problem, and one can predict in accordance with their wishes, will act as they. be considered but if this is not a reality with the matching conviction, it must act in their misconception forecast. ... Children learn to distinguish between three and five years of a person's beliefs be included. Before that can not understand that subjective beliefs differ from reality and therefore can not take it into account in its action prediction.
The Theory of Mind is also developing as a key requirement to be able to metacognition, the ability to make cognitive processes to become the object of reflection.
thoughtfully Somehow this Wikipedia entry in this context, but he does not exactly used to illuminate the likely pre-scientific concept of 'Mind' at * gg *. But so be it, is still so interesting is the wiki entry or?
Back to the Psychology Today article. To read, we can "? Do we really need more education or just more qualifications, skills and (technical) knowledge, or all these terms mean basically the same thing?" And a little further: "Reliable answers as to what education should be in the future and the future, there is not." But Gardner is with his 5 Minds :
- Disciplined thinking [= disciplined mind]
- synthetic thinking [= synthesizing mind]
- Creative Thinking [= creating mind]
- Respectful thinking [= respectful mind]
- ethical thinking [= ethical mind]
right here we are innocent of article-author Andreas Huber, the term 'Mind' as a 'thinking' prefixed. I then pull the same time the closing line: "Mind" = "think" = "key skills" = "intelligences" = "qualifications" = "(technical) knowledge" ... and then there is a reader in the article: "The five elements of Gardner's thinking and consciousness." Chakra ? Chakra !
I'm confused, what you can do all of those terms, so even if they probably think the same thing: We do what we do not have and put it in words like party programs.
In my heart of hearts believe I am still in the good in people, only about "skills" they should think not (yet), write and speak. The confused but only - right? * Gg *
0 comments:
Post a Comment