Orqester Sound Bank Reason 3 Taringa

When backspace is removed ... Why do I read

I love these discussions ...

know who Q10? Not that prepare samples ... but the ultimate lyricist. When I was early last year had first heard of it, i myself set out to replicate the part in a web form, it has fascinates me. Minimalism for the right use. I also added that what is written? No! Is back and sang quietly disappeared from the scene. Why? Because who does the really - an editor with which one can not distinguish between files back-and herhüpfen, which is the clipboard to the pivotal slice.

That's it.

And now today the fluke. Here there are him, the editor who has no Backspace key. Where you have no buffer. No, not an exercise for example ... He is created per requirements as a development order. Freeware, of course. And here is much discussion about him. It is surprising that such a text editor to stimulate philosophy (NDR = new German spelling). I even think about it.

Can a text editor - a writing tool may be reduced to a computer so that it is not even saves, but only prints ... and then everything is gone? As previously based on the typewriter, the good old typewriter with no correction button.

Unthinkable? No, not really. Even with Twitter to send away the tweeds of no more correction is possible! Old Times - New Tools. Web 2.0 makes it possible.

Has Anyone Used The Secure Smile?

nothing about it in Twitter?

The media strikes back. If Twitter has earned a reputation for its community, then the well to be very, very current. It is true that no one the responsibility for ensuring that there are about events in the world, the same is a tweed, but somehow that always happens. Always?

Today there was the Formula 1 qualifying in a serious accident. Massa. And Twitter was not immediately read what to do so. The

led to some inquired via Twitter, if thou have slept all? Why you because this or that on his friend list, have reported that the case is not in real time immediately. Finally, we had asked me about the usual ...

consumer attitude 150%-percentage or first signs of professionalization of the media? Why do I need

for all (!) Mission-critical information all currently receive from a Tweed ... It may not be a little imperfect and subjective? It's been huge, if I "sometimes" get information previously reported and witnesses. But always and for everything, even if there are no people on the ground, which could tweet authentic? And I think even if there are Twitterer on site, they can alone decide for themselves whether they want to tell the world an event. You may not non-communicating, but can not force anyone to mention, all accessible information on everything having to.

Free Riddles About A Golf Cart

tumblr push versus pull

Sometimes it comes to new and old themes quite unexpectedly * peep * . As I there yesterday on 'push'. And you wonder why the "old" issue has long hidden. I refer to the server-push technology, which had always been hidden in the MIME HTTP . Will put the time on my interests list. The topic has

But in other ways within itself. What if every mobile (cell phone), a complete server environment would do their job and we no longer gasping with our terminal services in any claim would take, but maintain the same right-Connect Server server would. For example, with an e-mail server would be all but completely push services such as those used in the BlackBerry approach, can put aside. And push the concept in the iPhone would need not one. Clear you would not be achieved if one would make up the cell phone. But you could also prevent so by taking away the cell phone the Abschaltknopf. Clearly then potter around more programs and you need more power - but that has been so anybody of anything seriously deterred.

best work directly with IPv6 tomorrow. Then you could assign each service on the phone a unique IP address and port Geraffel all fell away.

'm in my thoughts I quickly went a step further. Do we really need at all forms of communication that take place directed by e-mail, mobile telephone, SMS or chat between two communication partners? Or must Let us admit not slow that this one-to-one model is obsolete? I mean like the marriage of two? In the discussion about copyright, copyright, patents, there is probably also the realization that the idea of intellectual property protection is neither accepted nor the world really brings forward. Why not also consider the Internet a reality. E-mails are but most of the spam bin. And thanks to Facebook, Twitter and the likes, but rather to communicate to the world and not a single person. So away with all the related communication!

If you have something to say, no matter to whom, then written into his website and let the others who could relate to search for it. Thus the works at Twitter, if you have subscribed to his friends list or a specific topic. It really works. One can not just assume that it is being read. But we know it ... Invoices will be thrown away unread;) is clear that a certain change in the forms of interaction being taken, contracts are not always effective, Written and less important, and perhaps you have to write the whole legal system. But that would be nothing new. I can still remember vividly that it was unthinkable 30 years ago that they had contracts / purchase orders by fax or e-mail can make. And today? Normal. The Tax Office takes no internet yes no Tax Return more ...

So let us in the future no more conversations with individuals, but always with the 'world'. We could always read all the thoughts of all and secrecy would be abolished, even the best encryption. How many investments you could save this and the crime would also decrease drastically ... see Minority Report.

I'm looking forward and carry also happy with my "Social Web" contacts and forms of communication help to ensure that it goes in this direction.