Saturday, July 25, 2009

Orqester Sound Bank Reason 3 Taringa

When backspace is removed ... Why do I read

I love these discussions ...

know who Q10? Not that prepare samples ... but the ultimate lyricist. When I was early last year had first heard of it, i myself set out to replicate the part in a web form, it has fascinates me. Minimalism for the right use. I also added that what is written? No! Is back and sang quietly disappeared from the scene. Why? Because who does the really - an editor with which one can not distinguish between files back-and herhüpfen, which is the clipboard to the pivotal slice.

That's it.

And now today the fluke. Here there are him, the editor who has no Backspace key. Where you have no buffer. No, not an exercise for example ... He is created per requirements as a development order. Freeware, of course. And here is much discussion about him. It is surprising that such a text editor to stimulate philosophy (NDR = new German spelling). I even think about it.

Can a text editor - a writing tool may be reduced to a computer so that it is not even saves, but only prints ... and then everything is gone? As previously based on the typewriter, the good old typewriter with no correction button.

Unthinkable? No, not really. Even with Twitter to send away the tweeds of no more correction is possible! Old Times - New Tools. Web 2.0 makes it possible.

Has Anyone Used The Secure Smile?

nothing about it in Twitter?

The media strikes back. If Twitter has earned a reputation for its community, then the well to be very, very current. It is true that no one the responsibility for ensuring that there are about events in the world, the same is a tweed, but somehow that always happens. Always?

Today there was the Formula 1 qualifying in a serious accident. Massa. And Twitter was not immediately read what to do so. The

led to some inquired via Twitter, if thou have slept all? Why you because this or that on his friend list, have reported that the case is not in real time immediately. Finally, we had asked me about the usual ...

consumer attitude 150%-percentage or first signs of professionalization of the media? Why do I need

for all (!) Mission-critical information all currently receive from a Tweed ... It may not be a little imperfect and subjective? It's been huge, if I "sometimes" get information previously reported and witnesses. But always and for everything, even if there are no people on the ground, which could tweet authentic? And I think even if there are Twitterer on site, they can alone decide for themselves whether they want to tell the world an event. You may not non-communicating, but can not force anyone to mention, all accessible information on everything having to.